The rebate values have already been reduced this year, and the numbers of
systems that each supplier may submit for rebate each month have been
limited in order to increase the amount of time the programme can run for.
For those still sitting on the fence about whether or not to convert to
solar water heating, I would recommend that they do so sooner rather than
later in order to ensure their rebate.
Smith: I really can’t say, but what I can say is that the solar rebate
budget is completed for the year. However, they are running a special
reduced rebate.
Bredenkamp: According to my knowledge, the rebate in its current form will
not last beyond 2011 unless a significant amount of additional funding is
secured for this purpose.
Tudor-Jones: When the money runs out?
How will Eskom replenish the money spent on the rebate programme?
Shirley: Unfortunately I can’t speak for Eskom (or NERSA). However, it is my
opinion that should the programme continues any additional funds would be
taken from the ever-increasing electricity prices.
Rewarding those who switch and penalizing those who choose not to switch to
solar (or at least a heat pump) seems to me like the best way to go while
our country is experiencing an energy shortage.
Bredenkamp: As consumers of electricity, the onus currently will rests on us
to pay back the money for this rebate program. Even if the funding model
changes from a tariff-based levy, we (as tax payers), will end up paying
through a treasury/fiscal allocation.
Smith: The idea is simple, subsidise solar systems which reduces load on the
electrical grid. With a reduced load there is no need for power stations.
Subsidising solar is cheaper than building a power station.
According to Frost and Sullivan, the SWH market experienced volatile growth
between 2007 – 2010 that was plagued by malfunctioning products,
fly-by-night companies and incorrect installations. Do you agree? If so why?
Do you disagree? If so why?
Shirley: I agree strongly that the SWH market has experienced volatile
growth. Unfortunately, many South Africans have paid good money for bad
systems on terrible advice from people trying to make a quick buck on solar
water heating.
A solar water heater should be selected based on reliability, service and
applicability to your needs (much like any other investment), rather than on
price.
Many of the systems that were brought into South Africa, while perhaps being
applicable to another country’s environmental conditions, were not relevant
to our local temperatures, weather patterns and water quality.
These factors have led to overheating in summer, freezing in winter,
bursting due to pressure or rapid component deterioration due to chlorinated
water – all of which have done damage to the name of the industry as a
whole. Even worse than this, though, is the poor quality of installation and
total lack of understanding of how the systems work by unqualified (and many
supposedly “qualified”) installers.
Regulations and industry bodies are in place to deal with this. However, it
is very difficult to police those operating outside of the rules unless
something catastrophic happens and the matter comes to the attention of the
ombudsman.
The good news is that we are now seeing fewer and fewer different
manufacturers in the market – those who are surviving and doing well seem to
be coming from “real” companies who have a long-term plan and will be around
long enough to honour their warranties.
Bredenkamp: Probably before 2007, when there were no Standards in place
and/or a test facility at the SABS.
Smith: I fully agree. The problem is the fact that a growth spurt resulted
in opportunists who did not care for the solar plumbing industry. These
people only came to pillage our industry and weren’t interested in adding
value to this market.
Tudor-Jones: I do agree. The Solar Water Heating Division of SESSA reported
at the March 2011 AGM that membership grew from 272 to 510 in 12 months.
They also reported that 168 members had resigned in the previous 8 months. I
know of a reported +/- 1000 collectors which failed during the June 16th
2010 black frost. This is one incident which caused many casualties within
the industry and does not include other issues of overheating and the like
that has also occurred since the influx of vac-tubes into the market.
How are building codes and regulations influencing the SWH market?
Shirley: SANS 10400X has now been promulgated, which means that within a few
months it could become law for any new building that at least 50% of the
water heating must be done by non-electric resistance means.
Since SWH is not applicable to every home or business, the client also has
the option to achieve this by, amongst others, using heat pumps or
installing a heat-recovery system.
It is becoming more important for developers, architects, specifiers, QS’s
and consulting professionals to develop an understanding of the functioning,
and advantages and disadvantages of each, and of which systems are available
in the market that they would recommend to their clients.
Bredenkamp: The regulations have only just been published and once properly
up-and-running, will have a positive effect, i.e. the requirement that where
hot water is provided, a maximum of 50% by volume can be supplied by the
traditional electrical-resistance water heater and 50% must be from a
renewable resource.
Smith: The building codes and regulations impacted the SWH market
drastically.
Tudor-Jones: We haven’t seen any impact as of yet, but we will see a
positive influence once the new SANS10400 PartXA2 becomes mandatory in Feb
2012.
Karel Deist, Head of Laboratory Solar – SABS: These standards are there to
support the market in a positive way. The standards and regulations protect
the end user against possible abuse and claims about the functionality of
these systems.
You have various standards and regulations that govern the installation of
SWH’s like the Occupational Health and Safety act (OSH), the National
Building Regulations and Installation codes.
There are two important clauses dealing with this matter in the said
Occupational, Health and Safety Act. The first one is clause 10 which states
the following:
General duties of manufacturers and others regarding articles and substances
for use at work
(1) Any person who designs, manufactures, imports, sells or supplies any
article for use at work shall ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable,
that the article is safe and without risks to health when properly used and
that it complies with all prescribed requirements.
(2) Any person who erects or installs any article for use at work on or in
any premises shall ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, that nothing
about the manner in which it is erected or installed makes it unsafe or
creates a risk to health when properly used.
(3) Any person who manufactures, imports, sells or supplies any substance
for use at work shall.
(a) Ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, that the substance is safe
and without risks to health when properly used.
(b) Take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that information is
available with regard to the use of the substance at work, the risks to
health and safety associated with such substance, the conditions necessary
to ensure that the substance will be safe and without risks to health when
properly used and the procedures to be followed in the case of an accident
involving such substance.
(4) Where a person designs, manufactures, imports, sells or supplies an
article or substance for or to another person and that other person
undertakes in writing to take specified steps sufficient to ensure, as far
as is reasonably practicable, that the article or substance will comply with
all prescribed requirements and will be safe and without risks to health
when properly used, the undertaking shall have the effect of relieving the
firstmentioned person from the duty imposed upon him by this section to such
an extent as may be reasonable having regard to the terms of the
undertaking.”
The second very important regulation that one should keep in mind is as per
the SA Government Gazette no. 22355, Notice No. 509 and Regulation no 7079
dated 8 June 2001.
Every consumer must comply withSABS/0252: Water supply and drainage for
buildings and SABS/0254: The installation of fixed electric storage water
heating systems, or similar substituting re-enactment or amendment thereof
if the consumer installation is of a type regulated by either standard.
This legislation requires that all new geyser installations and replacement
geyser installations performed after the 8th June 2001 must be in accordance
with the specification, which requires the installation to have a geyser
drip tray with overflow pipe piped to the exterior of the building. Vacuum
breakers must be installed on the hot and cold water supply and the overflow
from the safety valve and expansion relief valve must be piped to the
exterior of the building.”
What are the advantages of SWHs?
Shirley: The three main advantages of solar water heating are:
• They are reliable, especially thermosiphon systems which have no moving
parts. Incorrect installation or a total lack of maintenance is the most
common source of systems failing to produce hot water. Electric controllers
ensure that during periods of extended rainfall, or the very cold winter
days, the system reaches the desired temperatures.
• They are durable. Many systems offer 10 year guarantees, and flat-plate
collector technology has been proven over the past 30 years to operate very
well in conditions similar to South Africa. Clients can be certain, as long
as they invest with a reputable company, that they will certainly see a
great return on investment.
• They save money. It is not often that people get the chance to do
something that is good for the environment, good for society AND saves money
every month – a real triple threat.
Bredenkamp: The biggest advantage is the fact that we get to harness free
energy from the sun and generally would have accessible hot water during
times of extended power outages.
Smith: Renewable energy and lower energy costs are major advantages to SWH.
Tudor-Jones: The purchase of a quality solar water heater is a proven means
to save electricity, therefore money and our environment. They are built to
last and therefore have an excellent life cycle savings compared to that of
an electrical geyser. When comparing prices, the difference in cost between
the lower end, five year warranty models and the proven, ten year warranty
models is about R5000. This may seem like allot, but when you consider that
this is only one extra year of savings on your ROI in four years time,
compared to doubling your warranty, then the investment in quality is
absolutely worth it.
What are the disadvantages of SWH?
Shirley: High capital costs for a good system have been a major disadvantage
and slowed the sales of SWHs in South Africa. Finally there are attractive
financing options available for selected systems, and the monthly
installments can be offset by the savings. Instead of asking “how much does
the system cost?” can clients now ask “how much can I put back into my own
pocket every month?”.
Aesthetic reasons have also been a bump in the SWH rollout process. Two
years ago, we used to hear the term ugly almost every day. Now, however,
many homes display their systems proudly and most of our clients are
actually glad to show their neighbours that they are smart enough to install
a system.
Bredenkamp: SWH’s don’t always achieve the expected savings, i.e. very
dependent on the elements and human behavior. Another disadvantage is that
if something does go wrong, the consequential damage to property can be
quite significant.
Smith: The disadvantages of SWH’s are the fact that it is complicated to
install. There is a need for a higher plumber skill base, and for the last
15-years our plumbing skills base has been eroded due to the lack of
training. One can also say that another disadvantage is the fact that the
technology is complicated and the consumer does not always understand the
lifestyle shift. Another disadvantage is the fact that there were too many
fly-by-night companies selling one thing and the consumer not getting the
product that was promised to them. Thus the SWH market got a bad name.
Tudor-Jones: They are not always suitable for all applications due to
shadowing, roof type, orientation, inclination and often aesthetics. They
also have a higher capital cost than conventional geysers.
Where are the trends heading for SWH?
Shirley: The take-up on SWH has been slower than expected around the
country. However, the general public is now far more aware of the options
available to them. While many people want a SWH and understand all of the
benefits, there has been no need to switch. More than half of our clients
are people who have been quoted previously, and only made the decision to
switch when their electric geyser had burst and a replacement system was
necessary.
Every time the electricity price increases, sales volumes also spike – and
so long as it remains “cheaper” to install a solar water heater than to use
an electric geyser, the local market will continue to grow.
A couple of years ago it was very difficult to install an on-roof system in
South Africa, since home owners were concerned with the aesthetics of
systems. Recently, however, this has not been an issue and more and more
clients are opting for thermo-siphon systems because of better cost and
reliability over the split options.
Bredenkamp: Personally, I believe we will ultimately see more of a move
towards heat pumps in the middle-to-high income market sectors. They are
more reliable, predictable and ultimately more energy-efficient.
Smith: It is my opinion that the SWH trend is moving downwards. I strongly
feel that heat pumps will become the new solar solution.
Tudor-Jones: More up-market and environmentally-conscious homes will install
SWH whereas more middle-income, money-conscious homeowners will go for heat
pumps.
How long does a SWH last?
Shirley: A good SWH has a design lifespan of 20 years or longer, and should
have a warranty on physical components of 10 years – this ensures that every
owner will benefit financially over an electrical geyser, even if financed.
Flat-plate collector systems have been installed in many countries around
the world since the early 1980’s, many of which are still in existence
today. A poorly designed or installed system, however, may only last two
years. It is critically important that suppliers, installers and clients
understand exactly what each system does and the impact that various
environmental, water and time-of-use conditions have on each, so that they
can offer the best advice and make.
Bredenkamp: Depending on the specific quality of the system, but generally
the panels should last between 15 to 20 years and the reservoir tank five to
ten years.
Tudor-Jones: Some better quality, proven brands can last up to 20 years.
Cheaper models have been known to last between five to ten years. If ones
return on capital is only in year four for instance and there is a risk of
having to replace the unit or a major component of the unit in year five,
then the investment in a higher priced, better quality and longer lasting
unit becomes favorable.
Are we seeing more SWH products imported or locally manufactured? Why?
Shirley: While there are still more imported systems available than local
products, we are now seeing more and more locally manufactured components
and complete systems in South Africa. There are several reasons for this:
• In order to stimulate local employment and keep South African funds in SA,
Eskom’s rebate structure is changing to allow for greater rebates for
systems with a higher local content.
• The Department Of Trade and Industry is offering assistance for setting up
local factories in order to stimulate local employment.
• There are now sufficient skills in South Africa to ensure that quality
standards are met (and exceeded in many cases).
Bredenkamp: Definitely imported, and this has got to change if we really
want SWH’s to make a significant impact to the South African economy through
local job creation, etc. However, price and quality will always be the key
determinant and it remains a challenge to compete with China in this regard.
Smith: Most of our SWH’s are imported, and this is simply because no South
African manufacturer in their right mind will invest in such a market. What
surety does South African manufacturers have, if they put capital in for
factories and manufacturing lines etc, when their own government and
parastatals do not support South African products.
Tudor-Jones: There are still more imports. Local content specifications may
change this in future. Until there is less choice and a strong single
supplier emerges, local producers will continue to struggle.
How do insurance companies play a role in the SWH market, if any?
Bredenkamp: Some of them are coming to the party, but the challenge remains
that when a conventional geyser fails, the home owner basically wants the
general situation relating to access to hot water resolved, without delay.
If one first has to “think” about the pros and cons of SWH vs a conventional
heater (cost, electrical back-up, aesthetic impact on the roof, etc.), the
majority of customers opt to go for what they originally had installed.
Smith: Insurance companies play a massive role in the SWH market. They have
a capture market, however the problem is that SWH’s do not fit into their
models, i.e. the client wants hot water and they want it now, not later –
SWH on average has a lead time of three to five days.
Tudor-Jones: Most major insurers have chosen reputable suppliers and proven
brands as optional replacements when geysers fail but the uptake by the
insured is still very low. I feel the insurance industry holds the key to
turning around our solar industry as it makes the most sense to convert to
solar when a big chunk of your capital cost is covered by your insurance
company.
25° in Africa would like to thank James Shirley, General Manager of Kayema
Energy Solutions, Barry Bredenkamp, Operations Manager at the National
Energy Efficiency Agency, Lea Smith from the Institute Of Plumbers South
Africa, Dylan Tudor-Jones, Managing Director of Solar Heat Exchangers, and
Karel Deist Head of Laboratory, Water Meters and Solar – SABS, for their
contribution to this article.

When one looks at a comparison between solar and coal the main difference is that coal power stations need ongoing supplies of fuel/coal in order to it to operate whereas solar has free fuel in the form of sun radiation. Thus if we can understand better the future price of coal, perhaps we can predict when solar power will become cheaper than coal.

Recently GE’s Global Research Director Mark M. Little said that GE will soon be able to produce electricity at prices that are cheaper than current coal power stations.

First Solar believe it will be able to compete with conventional electricity generation within 3 years.

These discussions of course don’t take into account the enormous health costs of coal burning power stations. Recently a Harvard Medical professor coauthored a paper that the health costs of coal power in the US alone is more than $500 billion.

Managing Director of Kayema Energy Solutions Dr Dino Petrarolo stated that “Using the SATEC platform, Kayema Energy Solution is able to provide clients in South Africa a full range of solutions including billing, sub metering, electricity demand reduction and power quality monitoring. We are excited to be joining with the SATEC team to provide these services to the South African market which are geared to maximizing revenue and profitability for property owners while at the same time reducing electricity costs. Energy management is especially critical now more than ever considering the latest price increases by Eskom of more than 25%”. Based on statements by Eskom executives, these price increases are expected to continue at this rate until 2014 and thereafter at rates that are significantly above inflation.

About Kayema Energy Solutions

Kayema Energy Solutions (PTY) Ltd. is a leading engineering integrator of large scale commercial and residential Solar Water Heating solutions in Southern Africa. Kayema provides know how and experience that is unrivaled in the region when it comes to executing large scale renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in South Africa having completed projects for the Legacy Resorts Group, Investec and Standard Bank. Our shareholders include Group Five Ltd. www.g5.co.za one of the largest publicly traded engineering firms in Africa. Kayema was awarded South African Association for Energy Efficiency 2010 Energy Company of the Year Award Winner for its ground breaking performance. For more details, please see www.kayema.co.za.

About SATEC Ltd.

SATEC Ltd. is a global leader in the research, development and manufacturing of energy management and power quality solutions. With 25 years of rich experience in energy management and a presence in more than 60 countries around the world, the SATEC team has the technological expertise to deliver flexible solutions for customer applications worldwide. All SATEC devices comply with world-acknowledged regulations and are supported by SATEC’s energy management software. SATEC’s on-line service, eXpertpower, collects, archives and analyses energy and power quality data. eXpertpower allows multiple users to view data, create automated billing, produce sophisticated reports and implement energy saving plans. PAS – Power Analysis Software – provides direct data access for monitoring and analysis. PAS is bundled with all SATEC instruments. . For more details, please visit www.satec-global.com

###